National Land Cover Database Zone 51 Land Cover Layer

Metadata also available as

Metadata:


Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Geological Survey
Publication_Date: 20030901
Title: National Land Cover Database Zone 51 Land Cover Layer
Edition: 1.0
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Series_Information:
Series_Name: None
Issue_Identification: None
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Sioux Falls, SD
Publisher: U.S. Geological Survey
Other_Citation_Details:
References: Homer, C., C. Huang, L. Yang, B. Wylie and M. Coan, 2004. Development of a 2001 national land cover database for the United States. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing Vol.70,No.7,pp 829-840 or online at www.mrlc.gov/publications. The USGS acknowledges the support of NOAA and Space Imaging in development of data in this zone.
Online_Linkage: <http://www.mrlc.gov>
Larger_Work_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Coastal Services Center (CSC)/Coastal Change Analysis Products(C-CAP)
Publication_Date: 200301003
Title:
C-CAP Late-Date Classification of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: remote-sensing image
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: NOAA CSC, Charleston, SC
Publisher: NOAA CSC
Online_Linkage: <http://www.csc.noaa.gov>
Description:
Abstract:
The National Land Cover Database 2001 land cover layer for mapping zone 51 was produced through a cooperative project conducted by the Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics (MRLC) Consortium. The MRLC Consortium is a partnership of federal agencies (www.mrlc.gov), consisting of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), the National Park Service (NPS), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). One of the primary goals of the project is to generate a current, consistent, seamless, and accurate National Land cover Database (NLCD) circa 2001 for the United States at medium spatial resolution. This landcover map and all documents pertaining to it are considered "provisional" until a formal accuracy assessment can be conducted. For a detailed definition and discussion on MRLC and the NLCD 2001 products, refer to Homer et al. (2004) and <http://www.mrlc.gov/mrlc2k.asp>.

The NLCD 2001 is created by partitioning the U.S. into mapping zones. A total of 66 mapping zones were delineated within the conterminous U.S. based on ecoregion and geographical characteristics, edge matching features and the size requirement of Landsat mosaics. Mapping zone 51 encompasses whole or portions of several states, including the state of Michigan. Questions about the NLCD mapping zone 51 can be directed to the NLCD 2001 land cover mapping team at the USGS/EROS, Sioux Falls, SD (605) 594-6151 or mrlc@usgs.gov.

Purpose:
The goal of this project is to provide the Nation with complete, current and consistent public domain information on its land use and land cover.
Supplemental_Information:
Corner Coordinates (center of pixel, projection meters) Upper Left Corner: 409560.00 meters(X), 2826300.00 meters(Y) Lower Right Corner: 1116990.00 meters(X), 2094390.00 meters(Y)
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 19991031
Ending_Date: 20030718
Currentness_Reference: ground condition
Status:
Progress: In work
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -90.665791
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -82.060114
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 48.210110
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 41.435621
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: Land Cover
Theme_Keyword: GIS
Theme_Keyword: U.S. Geological Survey
Theme_Keyword: USGS
Theme_Keyword: digital spatial data
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Category
Theme_Keyword: imagery
Theme_Keyword: Base Maps
Theme_Keyword: Earth Cover
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1995, Countries, dependencies, areas of special sovereignty, and their principal administrative divisions, Federal Information Processing Standard 10-4,): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology
Place_Keyword: United States
Place_Keyword: U.S.
Place_Keyword: US
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: zone 51
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus:
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1987, Codes for the identification of the States, the District of Columbia and the outlying areas of the United States, and associated areas (Federal Information Processing Standard 5-2): Washington, D.C., National Institute of Standards and Technology
Place_Keyword: Michigan
Place_Keyword: MI
Place_Keyword: Great Lakes
Place_Keyword: Coastal Zone
Place_Keyword: Upper Peninsula
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: None
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Customer Services Representative
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: USGS/EROS
Address: 47914 252nd Street
City: Sioux Falls
State_or_Province: SD
Postal_Code: 57198-0001
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 605/594-6151
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 605/594-6933
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 605/594-6589
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: custserv@usgs.gov
Hours_of_Service: 0800 - 1600 CT, M - F (-6h CST/-5h CDT GMT)
Contact_Instructions:
The USGS point of contact is for questions relating to the data display and download from this web site. For questions regarding data content and quality, refer to: <http://www.mrlc.gov/mrlc2k.asp> or email: mrlc@usgs.gov
Data_Set_Credit: U.S. Geological Survey, NOAA, Space Imaging
Security_Information:
Security_Classification_System: None
Security_Classification: Unclassified
Security_Handling_Description: N/A
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows 2000 Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 1; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.0.0.535

Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
A team of field investigators participated in collection of field verification points in November 2002. Data validation teams consisted of personnel from the NOAA Coastal Services Center. Each team was equipped with a portable color laptop computer linked to a Global Positioning System (GPS). The field laptop runs software that supports the classified data as a raster background with the road network as a vector overlay with a simultaneous display of live GPS coordinates. Accuracy assessment points were generated with ERDAS Imagine software using a stratified random sample in 3x3 pixel homogeneous windows. These data were used to determine the overall and categorical accuracy for the Michigan C-CAP data. Both windshield survey methods of collection and airplane reconnaissance were implemented to collect the accuracy assessment points. 2883 verification points were collected plus additional points to illustrate misclassifications. The verification points were stratified across the land cover classes, but several sparse classes such as Palustrine Aquatic Bed and Unconsolidated Shore were severely underrepresented, thus the accuracy results for these classes were not statistically significant. Several tabulations were performed with the assessment point beginning with the first draft. Several iterations were needed to achieve the desired accuracy with regard to, especially, grassland/agriculture splits in the Upper Peninsula, and Lowland Forested/Lowland Shrub/Emergent Wetland in the Lower Peninsula. The final accuracy estimate for the State Classification was 87.7% with a value for Cohen's Kappa of 0.86.
Quantitative_Attribute_Accuracy_Assessment:
Attribute_Accuracy_Value: 87.7
Attribute_Accuracy_Explanation:
The U.S. Geological Survey can make no guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of this information, and it is provided with the understanding that it is not guaranteed to be correct or complete. Conclusions drawn from this information are the responsibility of the user.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
The NLCD 2001 database for mapping zone 51 consists of three main data products including: (1) per pixel classified land-cover data (2) sub-pixel percent imperviousness and (3) sub-pixel percent tree canopy density. The land-cover database also includes three additional metadata layers that provide users a spatial node map of the land cover classification. The three layers are: (a) a spatial node map of the land cover classification, (b) a spatial confidence map of the land cover classification, and, (c) a text file of logical statements related to the land cover classification.

Conceptually, the descriptive tree is a classification tree generated by using the final minimum-map- unit land cover product (1 acre) as training data, and Landsat and other ancillary data as predictors. The goal of the descriptive tree is to summarize the effects of boosted trees (10 sequential classification trees) into a single condensed decision tree that can be used as a diagnostic tool for the classification process. This descriptive tree can be used to assess the relative importance of each of the input data sets on each land cover class. Such information may also be useful to customize the minimum-mapping-unit classification to meet a user's specific needs through raster modeling. Descriptive trees usually capture 60 to 80% of the information from the original land cover data.

The leaf or terminal nodes of the descriptive tree are assigned to sequential numbers (called node numbers) and mapped across the entire mapping zone on a pixel-by-pixel basis. These node numbers can then be matched with the various conditional statements associated with each respective terminal node. This spatial layer appears similar to a cluster map, but is the result of a supervised classification - not an unsupervised clustering. This node map can potentially be used as input by users to customize NLCD land cover, by linking the spatial extent of an individual node with the rules of the conditional statement.

The Land Cover spatial classification confidence data layer is provided to users to help determine the per-pixel spatial confidence of the NLCD 2001 land cover prediction from the descriptive tree. The C5 algorithm produces an estimate (a value between 0% and 100%) that indicates the confidence of rule predictions at each node based on the training data. This spatial confidence map should be considered as only one indicator of relative reliability of the land cover classification, rather than a precise estimate. Users should be aware that this estimate is made based on only training data, and is derived from a generalized descriptive decision tree that reproduces the final land cover data. However, this layer provides valuable insight for a user to determine the risk or confidence they choose to place in each pixel of land cover.

A logic statement from a descriptive tree classification describes each classification rule for each classified pixel. An example of the logic statement follows:

IF tasseled-cap wetness > 140 and imperviousness = 0 and canopy density < 4, then classify as Water

This logic file can be used in combination with the spatial node map to identify classification logic and allow modifications of the classification based on user's knowledge and/or additional data sets.

Additional information may be found at <http://www.mrlc.gov/mrlc2k_nlcd.asp>.

Completeness_Report:
This NLCD product of mapping zone 51 Land Cover layer is the version dated September 26,2006.
Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy:
Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report: N/A
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy:
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report: N/A
Lineage:
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
This classification is a final delivery for the NOAA C-CAP Michigan Project created by Space Imaging Solutions, Ann Arbor, MI. The area covered by the corresponding image file is the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. This late-date (circa 2000) map was created from a pre-existing classification the IFMAP (Integrated Forest Monitoring, Assessment, and Prescription) classification, created by Space Imaging under contract to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, beginning in 1999.

Field data were collected by MIDNR foresters and biologists in the summers of 1999-2001 drawn upon 1:15840 aerial photos. Quantitative information was collected with the photos relating to species composition in the understory, overstory, and ground cover. Training data collection was stratified over the entire state with regard to ecoregion, sub-ecoregion, and TM path/row. Within each "eco-scene", we attempted to collect examples of each of the land cover classes present. The information collected was sufficient to classify the sites, both natural and constructed, to an Anderson Level IV class, though the IFMAP classification was designed to classify land cover to level III.

During this time, the Landsat scenes selected for the classification were georeferenced to the MIRIS (Michigan Resource Inventory System) base roads and balanced and mosaicked. Three mosaics were produced: spring, summer, and fall, for the Upper and Lower Peninsulas. There were several areas of clouds, both in the Lower and Upper Peninsulas, that needed to be patched by imagery acquired much earlier, as early as 1992. These areas are small. Once the mosaics were completed, the training sites were digitized and checked for consistency on each of the dates. The signature data were then extracted to form the training site database for each date. The summer mosaics were classified to Anderson level 1 using statistical cluster analysis with ERDAS Imagine and S-plus statistical software. Once the result was satisfactory, the seven level 1 classes were separately classified to Anderson level 2 using the same techniques. Some modeling with ancillary data was necessary, primarily to isolate lowland types from upland types. The ancillary data used consisted of a weighted combination of NWI, a presettlement vegetation layer, and the MIRIS hydrology layer. Acquisition dates of Landsat ETM+ (TM) scenes used for land cover classification in zone 51 are as follows: SPRING-
Index 1 for Path 20/Row 29 on 05/04/02 = Scene_ID 7020029000212450
Index 1 for Path 20/Row 30 on 05/04/02 = Scene_ID 7020030000212450
Index 1 for Path 20/Row 31 on 05/04/02 = Scene_ID 7020031000212450
Index 2 for Path 21/Row 28 on 04/27/00 = Scene_ID 5021028000011810
Index 3 for Path 21/Row 29 on 04/30/01 = Scene_ID 5021029000112010
Index 3 for Path 21/Row 30 on 04/30/01 = Scene_ID 5021030000112010
Index 2 for Path 21/Row 31 on 04/27/00 = Scene_ID 5021031000011810
Index 4 for Path 22/Row 27 on 04/16/02 = Scene_ID 7022027000210650
Index 5 for Path 22/Row 28 on 04/26/00 = Scene_ID 7022028000011750
Index 5 for Path 22/Row 29 on 04/26/00 = Scene_ID 7022029000011750
Index 4 for Path 22/Row 30 on 04/16/02 = Scene_ID 7022030000210650
Index 6 for Path 22/Row 31 on 03/25/00 = Scene_ID 7022031000008550
Index 7 for Path 23/Row 28 on 04/26/03 = Scene_ID 7023028000311650
Index 8 for Path 23/Row 29 on 05/19/00 = Scene_ID 7023029000014050
Index 9 for Path 23/Row 30 on 04/25/00 = Scene_ID 5023030000011610
Index10 for Path 24/Row 27 on 04/24/00 = Scene_ID 7024027000011550
Index10 for Path 24/Row 28 on 04/24/00 = Scene_ID 7024028000011550
Index11 for Path 25/Row 27 on 04/23/00 = Scene_ID 5025027000011410
Index12 for Path 25/Row 28 on 05/02/03 = Scene_ID 5025028000312210
LEAF ON (Summer)-
Index 1 for Path 20/Row 29 on 07/18/03 = Scene_ID 5020029000319910
Index 1 for Path 20/Row 30 on 07/18/03 = Scene_ID 5020030000319910
Index 2 for Path 20/Row 31 on 07/15/02 = Scene_ID 5020031000219610
Index 3 for Path 21/Row 28 on 07/30/02 = Scene_ID 7021028000221150
Index 4 for Path 21/Row 29 on 06/25/01 = Scene_ID 7021029000117650
Index 5 for Path 21/Row 30 on 07/14/02 = Scene_ID 7021030000219550
Index 6 for Path 21/Row 31 on 06/09/01 = Scene_ID 7021031000116050
Index 7 for Path 22/Row 27 on 07/16/03 = Scene_ID 5022027000319710
Index 7 for Path 22/Row 28 on 07/16/03 = Scene_ID 5022028000319710
Index 7 for Path 22/Row 29 on 07/16/03 = Scene_ID 5022029000319710
Index 8 for Path 22/Row 30 on 07/02/01 = Scene_ID 7022030000118350
Index 8 for Path 22/Row 31 on 07/02/01 = Scene_ID 7022031000118350
Index 9 for Path 23/Row 28 on 06/23/01 = Scene_ID 7023028000117450
Index 9 for Path 23/Row 29 on 06/23/01 = Scene_ID 7023029000117450
Index10 for Path 23/Row 30 on 07/09/01 = Scene_ID 7023030000119050
Index11 for Path 24/Row 27 on 07/29/00 = Scene_ID 7024027000021150
Index12 for Path 24/Row 28 on 07/11/02 = Scene_ID 5024028000219210
Index13 for Path 25/Row 27 on 07/04/00 = Scene_ID 7025027000018650
Index14 for Path 25/Row 28 on 07/05/03 = Scene_ID 5025028000318610
Index15 for Path Derived/Row Various on Cloud Scene_ID Replacement
LEAF-OFF (Fall)-
Index 1 for Path 20/Row 29 on 11/04/99 = Scene_ID 7020029009930850
Index 2 for Path 20/Row 30 on 10/21/00 = Scene_ID 7020030000029550
Index 1 for Path 20/Row 31 on 11/04/99 = Scene_ID 7020031009930850
Index 3 for Path 21/Row 28 on 09/29/01 = Scene_ID 7021028000127250
Index 3 for Path 21/Row 29 on 09/29/01 = Scene_ID 7021029000127250
Index 4 for Path 21/Row 30 on 10/20/00 = Scene_ID 5021030000029410
Index 5 for Path 21/Row 31 on 10/28/00 = Scene_ID 7021031000030250
Index 6 for Path 22/Row 27 on 10/19/00 = Scene_ID 7022027000029350
Index 6 for Path 22/Row 28 on 10/19/00 = Scene_ID 7022028000029350
Index 6 for Path 22/Row 29 on 10/19/00 = Scene_ID 7022029000029350
Index 6 for Path 22/Row 30 on 10/19/00 = Scene_ID 7022030000029350
Index 6 for Path 22/Row 31 on 10/19/00 = Scene_ID 7022031000029350
Index 7 for Path 23/Row 28 on 10/10/00 = Scene_ID 7023028000028450
Index 8 for Path 23/Row 28 on 10/24/99 = Scene_ID 7023028009929750
Index 9 for Path 23/Row 29 on 10/24/99 = Scene_ID 7023029009929750
Index 9 for Path 23/Row 30 on 10/24/99 = Scene_ID 7023030009929750
Index10 for Path 24/Row 27 on 10/31/99 = Scene_ID 7024027009930450
Index10 for Path 24/Row 28 on 10/31/99 = Scene_ID 7024028009930450
Index11 for Path 25/Row 27 on 10/11/01 = Scene_ID 7025027000128450
Index11 for Path 25/Row 28 on 10/11/01 = Scene_ID 7025028000128450
Index12 for Path Derived/Row Various on Cloud Scene_ID Replacement

Once the level 2 map was complete, the map was divided by TM scene area and level 2 class. To achieve the level 3 classes different imagery dates were used depending upon the class. For instance, fall, or senescence, imagery was used to differentiate the level 3 broadleaf species, since the turning of the leaves aids in separation of broadleaf types. Differences between spring and summer images were used to classify some wetland types using differences in water levels. Differentiation of urban types (high-intensity/low-intensity) was often made using a thresholding technique in Landsat band 1 (blue).

Upon completion of the level 3 product, the map was disseminated among DNR foresters and biologists for field verification and checked for consistency against an older DNR forest database. The former step was very instructive in pointing out regions and sites in which the map accuracy was good and where additional work was needed. Using this data in conjunction with forest predictive models guided further supervised reclassification of natural areas.

From the IFMAP classification, a level 2 preliminary classification was made from a crosswalk developed between the IFMAP and C-CAP classification schemes. The IFMAP training sites were also recalculated under the C-CAP scheme. On average, 11% of the training sites did not directly crosswalk due to different land cover component thresholds. These training sites were traced to the pixels that they labeled, and those pixels were given the new C-CAP classification. This step produced a preliminary C-CAP basemap. Since the Southern Lower Peninsula of Michigan was completed for the IFMAP project prior to the Michigan C-CAP project coming up for bid, the required 3-mile buffer into Indiana and Ohio was not made. The buffer had to be classified, and, in anticipation of the edgematching award, the decision was made to extend the buffer to 10 miles.

To accomplish this, the triple-date TM imagery used to classify Southern Michigan originally was subset to cover an area at least 50 miles into Michigan and 10 miles into Indiana and Ohio. These subsets were then classified using an unsupervised routine (ISODATA), and, beginning with the summer date, were summarized with the C-CAP base map. The summaries were then used to label the clusters when there was a clear majority cover type. When a clear majority did not exist, another date was chosen to re-cluster unlabeled pixels. After the three dates were used few pixels remained unclassified, and those were clustered with Southern Michigan training sites, or manually edited. Manual editing was used as well to edgematch the extension to Southern Michigan. At this point, NOAA CSC staff visited the Ann Arbor office, and performed an accuracy assessment by gathering points throughout the state, as discussed in the accuracy portion of the metadata.

Once the first assessment of the draft map was complete, comments generated from drop points collected with AA points were incorporated into the map, and the map was sent for another assessment. The Upper Peninsula was assessed separately from the Lower Peninsula, and iterations of comments and modifications continued for several rounds, until the target accuracy of 85% overall and 80% minimum class accuracy was achieved. Several classes, such as Palustrine Aquatic Bed and Unconsolidated Shore, did not have enough points for statistical significance. Scrub Shrub in the Upper Peninsula had not enough points for significance. There was a fair amount of confusion between pasture grassland and cultivated land, especially in the Upper Peninsula. This required a number of iterations to create a satisfactory representation. Much of the confusion is believed to arise from phenological variation and crop rotation.

Large urban areas from the IFMAP classification had a different appearance than those in other C-CA products. The decision was made to filter the Michigan C-CAP urban areas to bring them into line with the products already completed. The model operated on contiguous areas of urban land cover greater than 2000 pixels After the classification was accepted by NOAA CSC, it was edgematched to classifications of the surrounding states. Edgematching involved using the overlaps between the state classifications and locating a path in that zone that would not produce a localized seam line. Subsequently, the overlap zone, including a zone up to 10 miles or more from the state border was edited as with the Ohio extension to equalize the classifications.

After the above classification, the C-CAP team at the NOAA Coastal Services Center performed a retrofit process to bring the data set into compliance with NLCD 2001 standards. This involved using the NLCD impervious surface for Developed Categories (includind adding a Medium Intensity and Open Space Developed) and the inclusion of a Pasture/Hay class). To develop the Pasture/Hay category, the original Grassland and Bare categories were subset for analysis. Training data for Pasture/Hay were derived from the 1992 NLCD and the Integrated Forest Monitoring Assessment and Prescription (IFMAP) data set, produced for the Michigan State Department of Natural Resources. A CART classification, based upon this IFMAP training data, was applied on the full zone. Hand editing was then performed to clean these newly classed areas. Similar classification procedures and editing was performed on all land cover categories in order to check and improve their consistency. These edits removed much of the speckle associated with the above produced classification while retaining the accuracy of that original product. The Developed classes were created through the incorporation of the masked NLCD Impervious surface. High, Medium, and Low Intensity Developed classes were included where the percent impervious value ranged from 80-100%, 50-79%, and 20-49% respectively. The Open Space Developed was included where the percent impervious value was from 1-19%, did not overwrite a forested class, and was in a spatially dense urban area (as determined through a focal filtered impervious mask image).

Process_Date: 20030601
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Clearinghouse Manager
Contact_Organization: NOAA Coastal Services Center
Contact_Position: Clearinghouse Manager
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: 2234 South Hobson Avenue
City: Charleston
State_or_Province: SC
Postal_Code: 29405-2413
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: (843)740-1210
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: (843)740-1224
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: clearinghouse@csc.noaa.gov
Hours_of_Service: Monday-Friday, 8-5 EST
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Methods used to generate the land cover dataset for zone 51 described above are similar to and compatible with methods used in other zones of the NLCD dataset. For coastal zones mapped by NOAA and/or NOAA contractors, the land cover dataset classification codes and the source dataset for classification of urban areas is different. For national consistency, an additional process step was added to cross-walk the NOAA class codes to standard NLCD 2001 class codes described in the Entity and Attribute Information section of this document. NOAA urban pixel values were replaced with values determined from the NLCD 2001 percent imperviousness mapping product. The four classes in urban and suburban areas were determined from the percent imperviousness mapping product (described in the next section). The threshold for the four classes is: (1) developed open space (imperviousness < 20%), (2) low-intensity developed (imperviousness from 20 - 49%), (3) medium intensity developed (imperviousness from 50 -79%), and (4) high-intensity developed (imperviousness > 79%).

The completed single pixel product was then generalized to a 1 acre (approximately 5 ETM+ 30 m pixel patch) minimum mapping unit product using a "smart eliminate" algorithm. This aggregation program subsumes pixels from the single pixel level to a 5- pixel patch using a queens algorithm at doubling intervals. The algorithm consults a weighting matrix to guide merging of cover types by similarity, resulting in a product that preserves land cover logic as much as possible.

Source_Used_Citation_Abbreviation: Landsat ETM, DOQQ, USDA, FIA, DEM, USGS/EROS, IKONOS
Process_Date: Unknown
Source_Produced_Citation_Abbreviation: USGS NLCD
Process_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Customer Services Representative
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: USGS/EROS
Address: 47914 252nd Street
City: Sioux Falls
State_or_Province: SD
Postal_Code: 57198-0001
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 605/594-6151
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 605/594-6933
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 605/594-6589
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: custserv@usgs.gov
Hours_of_Service: 0800 - 1600 CT, M - F (-6h CST/-5h CDT GMT)

Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster
Raster_Object_Information:
Raster_Object_Type: Pixel
Row_Count: 24398
Column_Count: 23582
Vertical_Count: 1

Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Map_Projection:
Map_Projection_Name: Albers Conical Equal Area
Albers_Conical_Equal_Area:
Standard_Parallel: 29.500000
Standard_Parallel: 45.500000
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -96.000000
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 23.000000
False_Easting: 0.000000
False_Northing: 0.000000
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: row and column
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 30.000000
Ordinate_Resolution: 30.000000
Planar_Distance_Units: meters
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: Geodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.000000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222

Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Detailed_Description:
Entity_Type:
Entity_Type_Label: Layer_1
Entity_Type_Definition: NLDC Land Cover Layer
Entity_Type_Definition_Source: National Land Cover Database 2001
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: ObjectID
Attribute_Definition: Internal feature number
Attribute_Definition_Source: ESRI
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain:
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Count
Attribute_Definition:
A nominal integer value that designates the number of pixels that have each value in the file; histogram column in ERDAS Imagine raster attributes table
Attribute_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Unrepresentable_Domain: Integer
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Value
Attribute_Definition:
Land Cover Class Code Value. Class definitions marked with an asterisk (*) are Coastal NLCD Classes only.
Attribute_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 1
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition: No data value, Alaska zones only
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 11
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Open Water - All areas of open water, generally with less than 25% cover or vegetation or soil
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 12
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Perennial Ice/Snow - All areas characterized by a perennial cover of ice and/or snow, generally greater than 25% of total cover.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 21
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Developed, Open Space - Includes areas with a mixture of some constructed materials, but mostly vegetation in the form of lawn grasses. Impervious surfaces account for less than 20 percent of total cover. These areas most commonly include large-lot single-family housing units, parks, golf courses, and vegetation planted in developed settings for recreation, erosion control, or aesthetic purposes
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 22
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Developed, Low Intensity -Includes areas with a mixture of constructed materials and vegetation. Impervious surfaces account for 20-49 percent of total cover. These areas most commonly include single-family housing units.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 23
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Developed, Medium Intensity - Includes areas with a mixture of constructed materials and vegetation. Impervious surfaces account for 50-79 percent of the total cover. These areas most commonly include single-family housing units.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 24
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Developed, High Intensity - Includes highly developed areas where people reside or work in high numbers. Examples include apartment complexes, row houses and commercial/industrial. Impervious surfaces account for 80 to100 percent of the total cover.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 31
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Barren Land (Rock/Sand/Clay) - Barren areas of bedrock, desert pavement, scarps, talus, slides, volcanic material, glacial debris, sand dunes, strip mines, gravel pits and other accumulations of earthen material. Generally, vegetation accounts for less than 15% of total cover.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 32
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Unconsolidated Shore* - Unconsolidated material such as silt, sand, or gravel that is subject to inundation and redistribution due to the action of water. Characterized by substrates lacking vegetation except for pioneering plants that become established during brief periods when growing conditions are favorable. Erosion and deposition by waves and currents produce a number of landforms representing this class.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 41
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Deciduous Forest - Areas dominated by trees generally greater than 5 meters tall, and greater than 20% of total vegetation cover. More than 75 percent of the tree species shed foliage simultaneously in response to seasonal change.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 42
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Evergreen Forest - Areas dominated by trees generally greater than 5 meters tall, and greater than 20% of total vegetation cover. More than 75 percent of the tree species maintain their leaves all year. Canopy is never without green foliage.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 43
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Mixed Forest - Areas dominated by trees generally greater than 5 meters tall, and greater than 20% of total vegetation cover. Neither deciduous nor evergreen species are greater than 75 percent of total tree cover.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 51
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Dwarf Scrub - Alaska only areas dominated by shrubs less than 20 centimeters tall with shrub canopy typically greater than 20% of total vegetation. This type is often co-associated with grasses, sedges, herbs, and non-vascular vegetation.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 52
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Shrub/Scrub - Areas dominated by shrubs; less than 5 meters tall with shrub canopy typically greater than 20% of total vegetation. This class includes true shrubs, young trees in an early successional stage or trees stunted from environmental conditions.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 71
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Grassland/Herbaceous - Areas dominated by grammanoid or herbaceous vegetation, generally greater than 80% of total vegetation. These areas are not subject to intensive management such as tilling, but can be utilized for grazing.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 72
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Sedge/Herbaceous - Alaska only areas dominated by sedges and forbs, generally greater than 80% of total vegetation. This type can occur with significant other grasses or other grass like plants, and includes sedge tundra, and sedge tussock tundra.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 73
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Lichens - Alaska only areas dominated by fruticose or foliose lichens generally greater than 80% of total vegetation.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 74
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Moss- Alaska only areas dominated by mosses, generally greater than 80% of total vegetation.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 81
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Pasture/Hay - Areas of grasses, legumes, or grass-legume mixtures planted for livestock grazing or the production of seed or hay crops, typically on a perennial cycle. Pasture/hay vegetation accounts for greater than 20 percent of total vegetation.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 82
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Cultivated Crops - Areas used for the production of annual crops, such as corn, soybeans, vegetables, tobacco, and cotton, and also perennial woody crops such as orchards and vineyards. Crop vegetation accounts for greater than 20 percent of total vegetation. This class also includes all land being actively tilled.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 90
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Woody Wetlands - Areas where forest or shrub land vegetation accounts for greater than 20 percent of vegetative cover and the soil or substrate is periodically saturated with or covered with water.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 91
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Palustrine Forested Wetland* -Includes all tidal and non-tidal wetlands dominated by woody vegetation greater than or equal to 5 meters in height and all such wetlands that occur in tidal areas in which salinity due to ocean-derived salts is below 0.5 percent. Total vegetation coverage is greater than 20 percent.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 92
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Palustrine Scrub/Shrub Wetland* - Includes all tidal and non-tidal wetlands dominated by woody vegetation less than 5 meters in height, and all such wetlands that occur in tidal areas in which salinity due to ocean-derived salts is below 0.5 percent. Total vegetation coverage is greater than 20 percent. The species present could be true shrubs, young trees and shrubs or trees that are small or stunted due to environmental conditions.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 93
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Estuarine Forested Wetland* - Includes all tidal wetlands dominated by woody vegetation greater than or equal to 5 meters in height, and all such wetlands that occur in tidal areas in which salinity due to ocean-derived salts is equal to or greater than 0.5 percent. Total vegetation coverage is greater than 20 percent.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 94
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Estuarine Scrub/Shrub Wetland* - Includes all tidal wetlands dominated by woody vegetation less than 5 meters in height, and all such wetlands that occur in tidal areas in which salinity due to ocean-derived salts is equal to or greater than 0.5 percent. Total vegetation coverage is greater than 20 percent.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 95
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Emergent Herbaceous Wetlands - Areas where perennial herbaceous vegetation accounts for greater than 80 percent of vegetative cover and the soil or substrate is periodically saturated with or covered with water.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 96
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Palustrine Emergent Wetland (Persistent)* - Includes all tidal and non-tidal wetlands dominated by persistent emergent vascular plants, emergent mosses or lichens, and all such wetlands that occur in tidal areas in which salinity due to ocean-derived salts is below 0.5 percent. Plants generally remain standing until the next growing season.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 97
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Estuarine Emergent Wetland* - Includes all tidal wetlands dominated by erect, rooted, herbaceous hydrophytes (excluding mosses and lichens) and all such wetlands that occur in tidal areas in which salinity due to ocean-derived salts is equal to or greater than 0.5 percent and that are present for most of the growing season in most years. Perennial plants usually dominate these wetlands.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 98
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Palustrine Aquatic Bed* - The Palustrine Aquatic Bed class includes tidal and nontidal wetlands and deepwater habitats in which salinity due to ocean-derived salts is below 0.5 percent and which are dominated by plants that grow and form a continuous cover principally on or at the surface of the water. These include algal mats, detached floating mats, and rooted vascular plant assemblages.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Enumerated_Domain:
Enumerated_Domain_Value: 99
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition:
Estuarine Aquatic Bed* - Includes tidal wetlands and deepwater habitats in which salinity due to ocean-derived salts is equal to or greater than 0.5 percent and which are dominated by plants that grow and form a continuous cover principally on or at the surface of the water. These include algal mats, kelp beds, and rooted vascular plant assemblages.
Enumerated_Domain_Value_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001 land cover class descriptions
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Red
Attribute_Definition:
Red color code for RGB slice by value for canopy image display purposes. The value is arbitrarily assigned by the display software package, unless defined by user. Standard user defined ramp for NLCD project is start color light gray, end color red.
Attribute_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 100
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: CSS Color Value Percentage
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.1
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Green
Attribute_Definition:
Green color code for RGB slice by value for canopy image display purposes. The value is arbitrarily assigned by the display software package, unless defined by user. Standard user defined ramp for NLCD project is start color light gray, end color red.
Attribute_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 100
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: CSS Color Value Percentage
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.1
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Blue
Attribute_Definition:
Blue color code for RGB slice by value for canopy image display purposes. The value is arbitrarily assigned by the display software package, unless defined by user. Standard user defined ramp for NLCD project is start color light gray, end color red.
Attribute_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 100
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: CSS Color Value Percentage
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.1
Attribute:
Attribute_Label: Opacity
Attribute_Definition:
A measure of how opaque, or solid, a color is displayed in a layer.
Attribute_Definition_Source: NLCD 2001
Attribute_Domain_Values:
Range_Domain:
Range_Domain_Minimum: 0
Range_Domain_Maximum: 100
Attribute_Units_of_Measure: Percentage
Attribute_Measurement_Resolution: 0.1
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Attributes defined by USGS and ESRI.
Class Red Green Blue
0 0.000000000 0.000000000 0.000000000
1 0.000000000 1.000000000 0.000000000
11 0.325490196 0.462745098 0.662745098
12 0.854901961 0.913725490 1.000000000
21 0.913725490 0.819607843 0.815686275
22 0.890196078 0.615686275 0.545098039
23 0.976470588 0.000000000 0.000000000
24 0.705882353 0.000000000 0.000000000
31 0.741176471 0.725490196 0.670588235
32 1.000000000 1.000000000 1.000000000
41 0.443137255 0.701960784 0.419607843
42 0.137254902 0.423529412 0.231372549
43 0.752941176 0.827450980 0.607843137
51 0.694117647 0.588235294 0.235294118
52 0.835294118 0.764705882 0.533333333
71 0.925490196 0.925490196 0.796078431
72 0.823529412 0.823529412 0.505882353
73 0.635294118 0.796078431 0.321568627
74 0.513725490 0.725490196 0.619607843
81 0.901960784 0.882352941 0.282352941
82 0.709803922 0.486274510 0.200000000
90 0.760784314 0.878431373 0.949019608
95 0.486274510 0.674509804 0.772549020
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
Attribute accuracy is described, where present, with each attribute defined in the Entity and Attribute Section. Note: To ensure all areas of mapping zone 51 are completely covered, a 3,000 meter (100 Landsat pixels) buffer was added to the boundary of mapping zone 51.

Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Position: Customer Service Representative
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: USGS/EROS
Address: 47914 252nd Street
City: Sioux Falls
State_or_Province: SD
Postal_Code: 57198-0001
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 605/594-6151
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 605/594-6933
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 605/594-6589
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: custserv@usgs.gov
Hours_of_Service: 0800 - 1600 CT, M - F (-6h CST/-5h CDT GMT)
Contact_Instructions:
The USGS point of contact is for questions relating to the data display and download from this web site. Questions about the NLCD mapping zone 51 can be directed to the NLCD 2001 land cover mapping team at the USGS/EROS, Sioux Falls, SD (605) 594-6151 or mrlc@usgs.gov.
Resource_Description: Downloadable data
Distribution_Liability:
Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the USGS, no warranty expressed or implied is made by the USGS regarding the use of the data on any other system, nor does the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. Data may have been compiled from various outside sources. Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This information may be updated without notification. The USGS shall not be liable for any activity involving these data, installation, fitness of the data for a particular purpose, its use, or analyses results.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: Arc/Info Export Format and/or ArcView Shapefile
Format_Version_Number: ArcGIS 9.0
Format_Specification: ASCII
Transfer_Size: 0.001
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: <http://seamless.usgs.gov>
Access_Instructions:
The URL <http://seamless.usgs.gov> provides a map interface that allows for data downloads within a customer defined area of interest. Zoom tools are available that can be used to investigate areas of interest on the map interface. The download tool allows the customer to capture layers from the map, utilizing the Seamless Data Distribution System process for downloading. A request summary page is then generated with the download layers listed. By clicking the "download" button on the summary page, a zipped file will be generated that can be saved on the customer's computer. The file can then be unzipped and imported into various user software applications.
Online_Computer_and_Operating_System: Not available for dissemination
Fees: None
Ordering_Instructions: Contact Customer Services
Turnaround: Variable
Custom_Order_Process: Contact Customer Services Representative
Technical_Prerequisites:
ESRI ArcMap Suite and/or Arc/Info software, and supporting operating systems.

Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20061116
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: U.S. Geological Survey
Contact_Person: REQUIRED: The person responsible for the metadata information.
Contact_Position: Customer Services Representative
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical address
Address: USGS/EROS
Address: 47914 252nd Street
City: Sioux Falls
State_or_Province: SD
Postal_Code: 57198-0001
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 605/594-6151
Contact_TDD/TTY_Telephone: 605/594-6933
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 605/594-6589
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: custserv@usgs.gov
Hours_of_Service: 0800 - 1600 CT, M - F (-6h CST/-5h CDT GMT)
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata_Time_Convention: local time
Metadata_Access_Constraints: None
Metadata_Use_Constraints: None
Metadata_Security_Information:
Metadata_Security_Classification_System: None
Metadata_Security_Classification: None
Metadata_Security_Handling_Description: None
Metadata_Extensions:
Online_Linkage: <http://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html>
Profile_Name: ESRI Metadata Profile

Generated by mp version 2.8.6 on Thu Nov 16 10:50:18 2006