The NLCD 2001 is created by partitioning the U.S. into mapping zones. A total of 66 mapping zones were delineated within the conterminous U.S. based on ecoregion and geographical characteristics, edge matching features and the size requirement of Landsat mosaics. Mapping zone 39 encompasses whole or portions of several states, including the states of South Dakota, North Dakota, Iowa, and Minnesota. Questions about the NLCD mapping zone 39 can be directed to the NLCD 2001 land cover mapping team at the USGS/EROS, Sioux Falls, SD (605) 594-6151 or mrlc@usgs.gov.
Conceptually, the descriptive tree is a classification tree generated by using the final minimum-map- unit land cover product (1 acre) as training data, and Landsat and other ancillary data as predictors. The goal of the descriptive tree is to summarize the effects of boosted trees (10 sequential classification trees) into a single condensed decision tree that can be used as a diagnostic tool for the classification process. This descriptive tree can be used to assess the relative importance of each of the input data sets on each land cover class. Such information may also be useful to customize the minimum-mapping-unit classification to meet a user's specific needs through raster modeling. Descriptive trees usually capture 60 to 80% of the information from the original land cover data.
The leaf or terminal nodes of the descriptive tree are assigned to sequential numbers (called node numbers) and mapped across the entire mapping zone on a pixel-by-pixel basis. These node numbers can then be matched with the various conditional statements associated with each respective terminal node. This spatial layer appears similar to a cluster map, but is the result of a supervised classification - not an unsupervised clustering. This node map can potentially be used as input by users to customize NLCD land cover, by linking the spatial extent of an individual node with the rules of the conditional statement.
The Land Cover spatial classification confidence data layer is provided to users to help determine the per-pixel spatial confidence of the NLCD 2001 land cover prediction from the descriptive tree. The C5 algorithm produces an estimate (a value between 0% and 100%) that indicates the confidence of rule predictions at each node based on the training data. This spatial confidence map should be considered as only one indicator of relative reliability of the land cover classification, rather than a precise estimate. Users should be aware that this estimate is made based on only training data, and is derived from a generalized descriptive decision tree that reproduces the final land cover data. However, this layer provides valuable insight for a user to determine the risk or confidence they choose to place in each pixel of land cover.
A logic statement from a descriptive tree classification describes each classification rule for each classified pixel. An example of the logic statement follows:
IF tasseled-cap wetness > 140 and imperviousness = 0 and canopy density < 4, then classify as Water
This logic file can be used in combination with the spatial node map to identify classification logic and allow modifications of the classification based on user's knowledge and/or additional data sets.
Additional information may be found at <http://www.mrlc.gov/mrlc2k_nlcd.asp>.
To conduct the land cover classification using DT, a large quantity of training data is required. For mapping zone 39, training data were collected from several combined sources including NASS, Iowa GaP, Minnesota GAP, North Dakota GaP, South Dakota GAP, and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.
Note that the training data were used to map all land cover classes except for four classes in urban and sub-urban areas (developed open space, low intensity developed, medium intensity developed, high intensity developed). All urban and suburban land cover classes were mapped and quality assessed separately through a sub-pixel quantification of impervious surfaces using a regression tree modeling method.
Following the development of the best classification through decision tree modeling, additional steps were required to complete the final land cover product. The four classes in urban and suburban areas were determined from the percent imperviousness mapping product (described in the next section). The threshold for the four classes is: (1) developed open space (imperviousness < 20%), (2) low-intensity developed (imperviousness from 20 - 49%), (3) medium intensity developed (imperviousness from 50 -79%), and (4) high-intensity developed (imperviousness > 79%). Other classes of forest and non-forest were combined with the urban classes to complete the land cover product. Finally visual inspection of the classification was made with areas/pixels that were wrongly classified delineated first as an "area of interest" (AOI), subsequently then limited manual editing was done to eliminate the classification error within the AOI.
The completed single pixel product was then generalized to a 1 acre (approximately 5 ETM+ 30 m pixel patch) minimum mapping unit product using a "smart eliminate" algorithm. This aggregation program subsumes pixels from the single pixel level to a 5-pixel patch using a queens algorithm at doubling intervals. The algorithm consults a weighting matrix to guide merging of cover types by similarity, resulting in a product that preserves land cover logic as much as possible.
Acquisition dates of Landsat ETM+ (TM) scenes used for land cover classification in zone 39 are as follows:
SPRING-
Index 1 for Path 27/Row 29 on 04/22/03 = Scene_ID 7027029000311250
Index 2 for Path 28/Row 29 on 03/03/00 = Scene_ID 7028029000006350
Index 3 for Path 28/Row 30 on 04/21/03 = Scene_ID 5028030000311110
Index11 for Path 28/Row 30 on 09/30/01 = Scene_ID 7028030000127350
Index 4 for Path 29/Row 28 on 05/03/02 = Scene_ID 7029028000212350
Index 4 for Path 29/Row 29 on 05/03/02 = Scene_ID 7029029000212350
Index 4 for Path 29/Row 30 on 05/03/02 = Scene_ID 7029030000212350
Index12 for Path 29/Row 30 on 10/20/00 = Scene_ID 7029030000029450
Index 5 for Path 30/Row 28 on 05/18/02 = Scene_ID 5030028000213810
Index13 for Path 30/Row 28 on 08/27/01 = Scene_ID 7030028000123950
Index 6 for Path 30/Row 29 on 05/04/00 = Scene_ID 7030029000012550
Index14 for Path 30/Row 29 on 05/18/02 = Scene_ID 5030029000213810
Index 7 for Path 30/Row 30 on 04/11/03 = Scene_ID 7030030000310150
Index 8 for Path 31/Row 28 on 05/19/00 = Scene_ID 5031028000014010
Index 9 for Path 31/Row 29 on 05/01/99 = Scene_ID 5031029009912110
Index10 for Path 32/Row 28 on 05/02/00 = Scene_ID 7032028000012350
LEAF ON (Summer)-
Index 1 for Path 27/Row 29 on 07/05/01 = Scene_ID 7027029000118650
Index 2 for Path 28/Row 29 on 08/10/00 = Scene_ID 7028029000022350
Index 3 for Path 28/Row 30 on 08/13/01 = Scene_ID 7028030000122550
Index 4 for Path 29/Row 28 on 08/01/00 = Scene_ID 7029028000021450
Index 5 for Path 29/Row 29 on 08/04/01 = Scene_ID 7029029000121650
Index 5 for Path 29/Row 30 on 08/04/01 = Scene_ID 7029030000121650
Index 6 for Path 30/Row 28 on 08/24/00 = Scene_ID 7030028000023750
Index11 for Path 30/Row 28 on 07/13/02 = Scene_ID 7030028000219450
Index 7 for Path 30/Row 29 on 08/27/01 = Scene_ID 7030029000123950
Index12 for Path 30/Row 29 on 06/16/01 = Scene_ID 5030029000116710
Index 7 for Path 30/Row 30 on 08/27/01 = Scene_ID 7030030000123950
Index13 for Path 30/Row 30 on 06/16/01 = Scene_ID 5030030000116710
Index 8 for Path 31/Row 28 on 07/14/00 = Scene_ID 7031028000019650
Index 9 for Path 31/Row 29 on 07/30/00 = Scene_ID 7031029000021250
Index10 for Path 32/Row 28 on 07/03/02 = Scene_ID 5032028000218410
LEAF-OFF (Fall)-
Index 1 for Path 27/Row 29 on 11/10/01 = Scene_ID 7027029000131450
Index 2 for Path 28/Row 29 on 10/27/99 = Scene_ID 7028029009930050
Index 3 for Path 28/Row 30 on 09/30/01 = Scene_ID 7028030000127350
Index 4 for Path 29/Row 28 on 10/20/00 = Scene_ID 7029028000029450
Index 4 for Path 29/Row 29 on 10/20/00 = Scene_ID 7029029000029450
Index 4 for Path 29/Row 30 on 10/20/00 = Scene_ID 7029030000029450
Index 5 for Path 30/Row 28 on 09/25/00 = Scene_ID 7030028000026950
Index 9 for Path 30/Row 28 on 07/13/02 = Scene_ID 7030028000219450
Index 5 for Path 30/Row 29 on 09/25/00 = Scene_ID 7030029000026950
Index 5 for Path 30/Row 30 on 09/25/00 = Scene_ID 7030030000026950
Index 6 for Path 31/Row 28 on 09/27/01 = Scene_ID 5031028000127010
Index 7 for Path 31/Row 29 on 11/06/01 = Scene_ID 7031029000131050
Index10 for Path 31/Row 29 on 07/30/00 = Scene_ID 7031029000021250
Index 8 for Path 32/Row 28 on 09/26/01 = Scene_ID 7032028000126950
Landsat data and ancillary data used for the land cover prediction -
Data Type of DEM composed of 1 band of Continuous Variable Type.
Data Type of Slope composed of 1 band of Continuous Variable Type.
Data Type of Aspect composed of 1 band of Categorical Variable Type.
Data type of Position Index composed of 1 band of Continuous Variable Type.